The Bretton Woods system of monetary management established the rules for commercial relations among the United States, Canada, Western European countries, and Australia and other countries, a total of 44 countries[1] after the 1944 Bretton Woods Agreement. The Bretton Woods system was the first example of a fully negotiated monetary order intended to govern monetary relations among independent states. The Bretton Woods system required countries to guarantee convertibility of their currencies into U.S. dollars to within 1% of fixed parity rates, with the dollar convertible to gold bullion for foreign governments and central banks at US$35 per troy ounce of fine gold (or 0.88867 gram fine gold per dollar). It also envisioned greater cooperation among countries in order to prevent future competitive devaluations, and thus established the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to monitor exchange rates and lend reserve currencies to nations with balance of payments deficits.
80 Years Of Broken Promises: The BWI’s, Neocolonialism, And Urgent Need For A Feminist Global Economic Order
July 22, 2024 – The Bretton Woods Institutions (BWIs) – the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) – are celebrating a dubious milestone in 2024: 80 years of shaping the global economic order. Established in the aftermath of World War II, these institutions promised a new era of cooperation and prosperity. However, their legacy, particularly for the Global South, is one of neocolonialism, economic injustice, and austerity. As such, we published a call for blog posts last month to collect and consolidate critical feminist reflections on the BWIs, mainly from the Global South, in an effort to provide an alternative perspective on this 80th anniversary.
The BWIs have perpetuated a system rigged in favor of wealthy nations, furthering economic subordination and hindering development in the Global South. These policies have disproportionately impacted women, hindering their access to education, healthcare, property rights, and economic participation. But the consequences extend far beyond gender. Austerity measures demanded by the BWIs, for instance, weaken social safety nets, lead to food insecurity, and negatively impact the climate, harming the well-being of entire communities.
We must highlight that it is not solely the BWIs acting in this capacity, but rather the global economic order they have helped create, with many governments complicit in its perpetuation. This neocolonial dynamic extends to occupation and militarism, with consequences starkly evident in Palestine, as the BWIs continue to promote imperial economic and geopolitical interests. Decades of Israeli occupation and economic strangulation, endorsed by the international community that the BWIs represent, have directly led to the genocide of Palestinians. This is not an isolated case. The BWIs’ focus on debt repayment and neoliberal economic policies often restricts resources available for governments to invest in education, healthcare, and infrastructure, creating ripe breeding grounds for social unrest and violence.
We need a fundamental shift. The current economic order, designed by and for the benefit of a select few, is failing the vast majority of the world’s population. We must reject austerity and embrace alternative economic models that prioritize justice, equality, sustainable development, and the well-being of all people.
Categories: Featured, Slider Featured
