Women’s Roles in Peace Consolidation-UN Security Council Debate on Women, Peace & Security-UNIFEM
Author: Womens UN Report Network
Date: October 30, 2006
UNIFEM – Women’s Roles in Peace Consolidation
Noeleen Heyzer, Executive Director, UNIFEM
Security, 26 October 2006.
Mr. President and Members of the Security Council,
Thank you for the honour to address the Security Council on women’s roles in
peace consolidation. Peace consolidation is an uncertain enterprise. It is one
thing to agree to a ceasefire, and quite another to move from there to a point
where societies can resolve conflicts through inclusive governance without
reverting to armed combat. This year we have seen many examples — from
Timor-Leste to the Solomon Islands, Afghanistan to Iraq, the process of
establishing a secure peace appears even more difficult than it did a year ago.
With the setting up of the Peacebuilding Commission, the UN has strengthened its
peacebuilding architecture, increasing coherence in fulfilling its peacebuilding
mandate. But today we must ask what else is urgently needed, and how Security
Council resolution 1325 could be more effectively implemented to bring about
just and sustainable peace.
From our work in over 20 conflict-affected countries, UNIFEM has learned what
is needed to implement resolution 1325 effectively in peace consolidation. Let
me mention three points:
1. Peace-building efforts must ensure women’s physical and economic
security
In peacemaking and peacebuilding, the urgent often
drives out the important. The urgent is the need to stop the fighting —
which means placating former combatants and addressing the grievances of warring
parties in peace talks and agreements. But parties to the conflict are not the
same as parties to the peace. Peacebuilding and consolidation require that all
parties with an interest in peace are engaged in negotiating a new social
contract, building institutions of a new society, and re-establishing
livelihoods.
Women are a crucial resource in this process. Peace agreements, early
recovery and post-conflict governance do better when women are involved. Women
make a difference in part because they adopt a more inclusive approach to peace
and security and address key social and economic issues that provide the
foundations of sustainable peace and that would otherwise be ignored. The
question is not only what women can bring to peace consolidation, but also what
peacebuilding can do to promote women’s human rights and gender equality —
transforming social structures so they do not reproduce the exclusion and
marginalization that underlie conflict.
Women know the costs of war: what it means to be subject to sexual violence
designed to destroy communities, what it means to be displaced, to flee their
homes and property, to be excluded from public life and regarded as less than
full citizens. Peace consolidation must include ending impunity for sexual
violence and raising the political and economic costs to those who engage in it,
making sure they are not rewarded with state power and high profile jobs as a
result of negotiated peace agreements.
Two of women’s most urgent needs are for physical safety and economic
security. Efforts to engage women in public decision-making will not succeed if
women risk continued violence for taking on public roles, and they cannot be
expected to be effective public actors if they have no source of livelihood.
What UNIFEM is seeing on the ground — in Iraq, Afghanistan, Somalia — is that
public space for women in these situations is shrinking. Women are becoming
assassination targets when they dare defend women’s rights in public
decision-making. And everywhere there is evidence that sexual and gender-based
violence is taken into homes and communities after conflicts have ended, as
ex-combatants return with small arms, and social norms that protect women remain
broken.
In all of the conflict areas we have worked, we have witnessed women’s
willingness to take risks — reaching across borders, organizing to support
dialogue and defying threats to their security. But we cannot rely on the
bravery of women; we need systems to be in place. In peace consolidation, the
international community must invest in reforming the security sector to ensure
women’s safety, particularly where armies or police have been a source of the
violence they experience. In Rwanda, after police said they could not protect
women as they lacked vehicles for rapid response, UNIFEM organized an
inter-agency response to set up specialized gender desks in police stations and
provide them with training, hotlines and motorcycles to reach women in remote
districts.
2. Sustainable peace requires real justice for women
To
consolidate peace there must be justice for women in accordance with
international human rights standards. This means removing all laws that
discriminate against women, formulating new gender equality laws, strengthening
rule of law institutions to implement them, and empowering women to access these
institutions and demand their rights. To support these efforts, UNIFEM is
working with the International Legal Assistance Consortium (ILAC) to support a
global Partnership for Gender Justice, co-chaired by the Governments of Sweden
and South Africa, to marshal Member States, UN system, and non-governmental
resources to support these efforts.
Too often in conflict-affected countries we see that laws on victim
compensation do not include compensation for rape, which is regarded as a minor
crime. I just returned from Kosovo with Goodwill Ambassador Nicole Kidman, where
we met with women who had been brutally raped during the conflict. They feel
doubly violated now as they seek justice, both locally and from international
tribunals who promise to help them but never deliver. If we are serious about
ensuring justice and consolidating peace, we must do more to provide legal
training for judges and lawyers, witness protection, medical support services
and compensation.
Family matters and personal status are typically left to traditional or
customary legal systems — partly because they are an inexpensive system of
dispute resolution, and partly to buy the cooperation of traditional or tribal
leaders by giving them control over personal and family matters. The result is
the perpetuation of honour crimes, exchange of women to resolve inter-clan
disputes, denial of women’s inheritance rights and other human rights
violations. Justice for women cannot be done on the cheap, and women’s rights
cannot be bargained away for other political gains. Justice for women has to be
featured as an integral and achievable part of any UN strategic plan of
assistance.
3. Peace processes require institutional change and stronger
accountability systems
Women’s engagement in peace consolidation
requires consistent, sustained investment in strategies to ensure that the
institutions engaged in rebuilding governance, justice, security, economic, and
social systems have the will and the capacity to respond to women’s needs, and
that women are taking leadership roles in influencing these processes. UNIFEM’s
peace and security approach is based on five integrated elements: (1) bringing
women to the peace table; (2) supporting women’s engagement in building new
constitutional and legal frameworks; (3) investing in women’s leadership in the
development of new institutions, including gender-sensitive judicial and law
enforcement agencies; (4) building partnerships to generate and support national
gender justice movements advocating to integrate women into national peace,
security, development and rights agendas; and (5) support for women’s
participation in elections and political decision-making.
What we have learned is that the earlier women are recognized as peace agents
and engaged in peace processes, from mediations to peace negotiations to
constitutional reform, the more they are seen as legitimate actors. This is why
in Uganda this week, UNIFEM is supporting the launch of a Peace Caravan with
women from the Democratic Republic of Congo, Kenya and Uganda to demand that the
international community respect resolution 1325 and include women at the Juba
peace talks.
Some progress has been made in ensuring women’s inclusion in post-conflict
decision-making. A variety of quotas and reservation systems in Iraq, Burundi,
Rwanda, Afghanistan and elsewhere have resulted in record numbers of women in
national assemblies. But quotas alone will not ensure effective participation. A
social group that has long been excluded from public decision-making must be
supported to exercise the knowledge and skills needed to shape policy and
legislation and enforce implementation.
This is not just a problem of women’s capacities. It is about obstacles to
gender equality in the institutions that shape the ways decisions are made,
resources allocated, and policies implemented. Critical institutions — such as
the military and ministries of finance and planning — do not automatically adopt
gender equality goals even when peace agreements mandate them to do so. Three
changes are critical to enable public institutions to bring gender equality into
their leadership, staff, and peacebuilding work. These include :
- top-level directives that make women’s rights a key element of the
institution’s work; - incentive systems to reward efforts to address women’s needs and advance
their rights; - measures to include gender equality in individual work plans and
performance reviews.
Although more women have been brought into the military, the police and
civilian staff of peacekeeping missions, they are still a token minority.
Appointments of women to the top levels of mediation and facilitation teams, as
well as peacekeeping missions, are still rare. UNIFEM and other women’s rights
advocates must negotiate anew each time to bring women to peace talks or include
women’s priorities in post-conflict needs assessments, and even when they
succeed, they find that resources are not allocated to meeting these
priorities.
In conclusion, if we want to consolidate peace, we must stop rewarding
those who are most socially destructive, and engage those with constructive,
peaceful solutions. Writing in the 16th century, French philosopher
Montaigne stated: “Women are not wrong when they decline to accept the rules
laid down for them, since the men make these rules without consulting them.” One
way of understanding peace consolidation is as a massive national effort to
remake the rules of governance, justice, security and economic activity to
eliminate the causes of conflict, distrust, and inequalities. For women of all
social groups, this opportunity to participate in re-building the rules cannot
be missed. Only then will we have peace under the laws of justice.
___________________________________________________________________
================================================================
To
leave the list, send your request by email to:
wunrn_listserve-request@lists.wunrn.com. Thank you.
Categories: Releases