
Iran – Media Women Documenting Resistance – Risks of Advocating for Rights
Author: Womens UN Report Network
Date: July 22, 2005
WUNRN
ISIS International
____________________________________________________________________________
WUNRN
In May, the Iran Revolutionary Court handed down a very harsh sentence,
in absentia, on Ms. Mahboubeh Abbasgholizadeh who has now lodged
an appeal in the Court through her lawyer:
Website Link Gives Suggest Actions.
Iran
– Ms. Mahboubeh Abbasgholizadeh Sentenced to 2 ½ Years
in
Jail and 30 Lashes for ‘Acts Against National Security’
The Women Living Under Muslim Laws (WLUML) International Solidarity Network and
the Global Campaign to Stop Killing and Stoning Women (SKSW) are deeply
concerned by the sentencing meted out to our colleague and friend, Mahboubeh
Abbasgholizadeh, in May by the Iranian Revolutionary Court for exercising
her constitutional right to peaceful assembly. Please see WLUML
website link and scroll down to attached our sample letter . https://www.wluml.org/node/6306
On 8 May 2010, the Revolutionary Court in Iran sentenced Ms.
Abbasgholizadeh, 52, to two and a half (21/2) years in jail and thirty (30)
lashes for ‘acts against national security through conspiracy and collusion
intended to disrupt public security, disturbing public order and defiance
against government officers.” According to her lawyer, Mohammad Mostafai, she
was tried in absentia with the State knowing that his client was out of the
country and could not properly represent herself in court. Ms. Abbasgholizadeh
has twenty (20) days to lodge an appeal in the Court through her lawyer.
Background
Mahboubeh Abbasgholizadeh is a women’s rights activist and filmmaker. She is
an active member of the Stop Stoning Forever Campaign and the Iranian Women’s
Charter movement. She was the director of the Non-Governmental Organisation Training
Centre (NGOTC), an organisation formed to support the work of the growing NGO
community in Iran, which was closed down by the Revolutionary Court of Iran
during her first arrest in 2004. She also headed the Association of Women
Writers and Journalists NGO and was the editor-in-chief of Farzaneh, which is
‘a journal of women’s studies and research in Iran and Muslim societies’.
Ms. Abbasgholizadeh was first arrested on 1 November 2004 with her personal
effects summarily seized and her office closed down. The arrest was authorised
by Tehran’s Chief Prosecutor, Said Mortazavi, without any charges being filed
against her. Abbasgholizadeh reported having been subjected to extreme mental
and emotional torture throughout her detention, especially during her
interrogation. She was also deprived of her visitation rights by her family. On
4 March 2007, she was again arrested along with other women activists during a
peaceful demonstration in front of Tehran’s Revolutionary Court in solidarity
with five (5) women activists on trial for their demonstration on 12 June 2006
demanding equal rights in law for women in Iran. The national security police
provoked the demonstration through verbal and physical violence against the
women demonstrators and thirty three (33) of them were eventually arrested. Ms.
Abbasgholizadeh, along with another woman human rights defender Shadi Sadr, was
held in solitary confinement from 4 to 19 March while the rest of their
colleagues were released much earlier. Throughout her detention, Ms.
Abbasgholizadeh was kept in ward 209 of the notorious Evin Prison, which is run
by the Ministry of Intelligence of the Islamic Republic of Iran. As a condition
of her release on 19 March 2007, her bail was set at 250 million toman (or
US$260,000), a prohibitively high amount. Her NGOTC office, which was re-opened
after her release was again closed down and its bank account was frozen. She
has not recovered both until now.
On 21 December 2009, Ms. Abbasgholizadeh was amongst those arrested in Iran
while on their way to attend the funeral of Grand Ayatollah Hosseinali
Montazeri, a senior cleric who criticised the Iranian government’s crackdown on
demonstrators in the aftermath of the contested June 2009 presidential
elections. This time, she was arrested for her work as a filmmaker. She was
conditionally released after 24 hours based on the promise that she would
remove her films critical of the regime from the website of her
collective.
Our human rights
concerns
WLUML and the SKSW consider the sentencing of Ms. Abbasgholizadeh to 2 ½
years imprisonment to be harsh and the punishment by lashing to be cruel and
degrading. In the first place, the basis of her arrest and of the thirty two
(32) other WHRDs in 2007 was in direct contravention of Articles 21 and
22 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR),
which the Islamic Republic of Iran has ratified without any reservations. The
Islamic Republic of Iran is obliged to effectively apply the ICCPR in its
national laws and in its justice system.
Article 21 of the ICCPR guarantees that the right of
peaceful assembly shall be recognised by the State. Article 22,
on the other hand, guarantees that everyone shall have the right to freedom of
association with others, including the right to form and join trade unions for
the protection of his interests.
Article 27 of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Iran
guarantees its citizens the freedom to assemble peacefully and yet the Iranian
Penal Code contains a number of vaguely worded articles relating to “national
security” which prohibit a range of activities that do not amount to
recognizably criminal offences, including activities connected with journalism
or public discourse. For instance, Articles 498 and 499
prohibit forming or joining a group or association, either inside or outside
the country that seeks to “disturb the security of the country”. Article 500,
which prohibits “propaganda against the state”, and Article 610, which outlaws
“acting against national security”, are similarly vaguely worded.
The punishment of lashing is a form of torture and is also a violation of Article
7 of the ICCPR which states that no one shall be subjected to torture
or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment It is also in
contravention of Article 39 of the Constitution which bans all
affronts to the dignity of detained or imprisoned persons.
We also consider the trial held in absentia as inconsistent with Article
14 of the ICCPR, which provides that the accused shall be entitled to
be tried in his/ her presence.
Website Link Gives Suggested Actions
================================================================
To contact the list administrator, or to leave the list, send an email to:
wunrn_listserve-request@lists.wunrn.com. Thank you.
Categories: Releases